Subject	I was just googling around actually
Posted by	Broke_as_**** on November 10, 2010 at 10:18 PM
	This message has been viewed 60 times.
In Reply To	lol I have no idea on that one. All the crap i had in the posted by Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) on November 10, 2010 at 08:43 PM
Message	Not a lot of good info, a lot of the same question on a lot of forums with answers ranging from "no real difference" to "throw it off 15%". Either way dyno numbers are secondary to seeing a stable a/f ratio and smooth power delivery with no detonation.
Follow Ups	Lets play a guessing game. - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 19:33:00 11/10/10 @rw 381.4 (n/m) - ttz'in (NorCal) 19:44:56 11/10/10 339hp (n/m) - tuckz32 19:48:10 11/10/10 365@rw (n/m) - pearlzed(toronto) 19:51:56 11/10/10 328.9 (n/m) - Spddracer 20:06:14 11/10/10 Here it is. Mustang Dyno. - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:30:18 11/10/10 Weight: 4002? - Broke_as_**** 20:38:53 11/10/10 lol I have no idea on that one. All the crap i had in the - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:43:03 11/10/10 I was just googling around actually - Broke_as_**** 22:18:30 11/10/10 I was estimating 385hp at the crank with 15% loss - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 22:56:06 11/10/10 O yeah. Thats just pulls. The car has hand no tunning - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 20:38:58 11/10/10 Sweet! What did I win? (n/m) - Spddracer 22:12:00 11/10/10 A beer if we ever meet. (n/m) - Sleeper_TTZ(SeKy) 22:39:00 11/10/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.